User talk:Duke Ganote

Hey, Duke - I tried to email you and it bounced, mailbox over quota. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 16:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Proposed Deletion of List of churches in Fort Wayne, Indiana Requested

Someone has proposed deleting this spin off from the Fort Wayne page. Please drop by and comment. -- --CTSWyneken^(talk) 10:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unigov

The information you insist on including in Unigov is not relevant to the topic. The Unigov legislation was never intended to affect any city other than Indianapolis. The only reason it is written the way it is is that the Indiana Constitution prohibits private legislation. Hence the update to make it continue applying only to Indy. Even if we assume there is in fact a movement towards further city-county consolidation, it is not part of this topic. --L. Pistachio (talk) 08:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of new Wiki Ultradispensationalism page

Hello, I have created a new Wiki page Ultradispensationalism which accommodates E. W. Bullinger Acts 28 theology and I have moved all of the content from this Hyperdispensationalism page, along with all references and improved layout to that page. This change has been needed for a long time, as the two systems of belief of Ultradispensationalism and Hyperdispensationalism are clearly two separate systems of belief. I hope that you will continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia Mysteryofthegospel (talk) 08:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Music Man

Thanks for adding details to the synopsis section, but it is very difficult to keep synopsis sections from getting too long, and we struggle, throughout Wikipedia, to keep them down to readable lengths. Please use article talk pages to discuss ideas for adding to these sections, and please help us keep these plot summaries short. Thanks, and best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Dispensationalism, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Confession0791 ^talk 03:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, all of today's "mainstream" dispensationalists (Lindsey, LaHaye, Haggee), draw straight from classic dispensationalism, which is from Darby, not Watts. Ryrie's opinion does not change this. --Confession0791 ^talk 03:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Committee for Constitutional Government,

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Committee for Constitutional Government, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 00:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crabgrass_Frontier:_The_Suburbanization_of_the_United_States

I created this article as a pitiful stub a couple years ago because a teacher of mine in high school brought it up and I found it had no corresponding Wikipedia article. I return to it now in 2011 to find it significantly longer and I have you to thank! harej 04:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 22:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi Duke, can you please provide edit summaries that reflect the nature and intent of the change rather than perhaps a comment on the previous edit? Also use section edits so it shows in the article summaries which part of the article was edited. WP:ES states it quite nicely. (off topic: I quite enjoyed the SQL proof of Monty's paradox) Alex Sims (talk) 23:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics

The article Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

relies on one primary source; does not warrant an article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. serioushat 04:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to German autobahns may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Johannes Kepler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<blockquote>Original : ''4) Confirmatur vero fides hujus rei comparatione quatuor Jovialium et Jovis cum sex planetis et Sole.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stuart Highway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gun politics in Switzerland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Switchboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autobahn

Hi, just curious. The revert you made stated that the difference was between countries, however the source actually states the difference in the highway sytem was between States - surely this refers to the States of the United States?? Regards Denisarona (talk) 13:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hideki Yukawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuang-Tzu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Duke Ganote. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sundown town

What was your source for this edit? You mention "Loewen", but there are several different publications by Loewen used in the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Duke Ganote. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Duke Ganote. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Duke Ganote. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Homer Smith

It seems that Homer Smith is a redirect to Homer W. Smith. Might want to change that into the disam page (I put a redirect hatnote on Homer W. Smith due to that) Wgolf (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Homer Smith, Jr

Hello, Duke Ganote,

Thanks for creating Homer Smith, Jr! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The layout of this page looks pretty weird. Makes it somewhat difficult to read.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 00:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]